Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:45

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How could Trump, with his deplorable garbage supporters, manage to win an election?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
German Shepherd's Attempt to 'Teach Human Baby to Howl' Couldn't Be More Perfect - Yahoo
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
A Gigantic Megacomet Is Erupting as It Zooms through the Solar System - Yahoo
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Instant analysis: Andreyanov has impressed CBJ brass - NHL.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
USA roster: 15 MLS players called for 2025 Concacaf Gold Cup - MLSsoccer.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why are black women the largest unmarried group in the United States of America?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.